Find a Lawyer

DR. SAMIN JAN versus UNIVERSITY OF PESHAWAR THROUGH VICE-CHANCELLOR

With the request for a Section 42 declaration for trial and a temporary injunction exemption, the Permanent Order challenged the selection of the appointment of teachers at the University with the argument that no other person was eligible for the desired position because it was relevant. The article lacks 5 years of experience and passed the FC, BC and MCC exams in the Second Division, while the Plaintiff passed in the First Division Validity Plaintiff failed to indicate that in the Second Division Unable to pass the FC, BC and MSc exams to be a candidate for this article and Unable to offer any rules in support of 's conflict, only the validity of the candidate was removed at the time of the last selection of merit for the desired article.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013

• MUHAMMAD KAMRAN SOHAIL v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1549
• NORTHERN BOTTLING COMPANY (PVT.) LTD. INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, PESHAWAR v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2013 PTD 1552
• NASIR KHAN v. LAL MUHAMMAD KHAN 2013 MLD 1557
• MEHMOOD HUSSAIN SHAH v. Mst. PARVAIZI BIBI 2013 YLR 1584
• Syed ANWAR BADSHAH v. CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY COURT, ISLAMABAD 2013 PCrLJ 1607
• MUHAMMAD SADIQ v. State 2013 YLR 1617
• SAJID HUSSAIN TANOLI v. NADIA KHATTAK 2013 CLC 1625
• AMIN NAWAZ BLOUCH v. State 2013 YLR 1626

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2013 →

attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Pak Pattan Sharif lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes