Sections (b) and (c) praise the conviction for being drunk and smuggled, allegedly reduced in size of packets to 50 43kkg of hashish, from each packet to small quantities of hidden caves. Was recovered, was mixed separately; from the mixture, three samples, each weighing 10 grams, were isolated, one of which was sent to the Franz Science Laboratory for chemical analysis. , Was silent about the number of packets exported from the tanker, the weight of the said packet was not known, the prosecution, under the law, assumed that each packet should be weighed first. And then separate a small amount from each packet. After being properly sealed and marked for chemical analysis, the culprit will be guilty of the crime, which will be subject to the report of the forensic science laboratory, In the present case, the sample sent to the Franzic Science Laboratory for analysis could not be complied with. Was sent to, and his report was received as a positive indicator, in the circumstances, attributed solely to it Could go 10 grams of marijuana, which was covered under section 9 (b) of the Narcotic Substances Act 1997, and not under section 9 (c) of the Act, while section 9 (c) of the Narcotic Substances Act 1997 Changes to (b), under this, the punishment of the accused already passed by them was reduced, the penalty amount was also reduced from one lakh to ten thousand rupees.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
