Section 3 (b), 29, 30 and 31 of the Compensation Principle of Compensation The effect of one of the participants in the payment method of payment of compensation / interest defined, the Government, under section 4 of the Public Purpose The notification for the acquisition of land was jointly registered in the Registrar column of each landlord in the register according to the appropriate share share of the land, based on the possession of the land holdings, the names of several landlords who had published in the revenue records. The citation against the rights holder / awardee also approved the distribution by the collector and excluded the reference search. It was appealed before the Court that they should be divided on the basis of their property and their outstanding shares. Each landlord in the common land had to pay a legitimate right according to his title, irrespective of the fact that he had At the date of acquisition, more or less of the territory was in actual possession of a company owning all of its common land from all the joint partners and for how long it has been in possession of it does not have exclusive ownership of the particular land. Unless he has created an opposing title through any kind of cooperation. The owner and subsequently took no action under any limitation. The possession of the joint owner of the common land will be considered valid as long as the underground government has taken possession of the same for the other co-owners. There was no chance of the matter becoming interested. Section 3 (b) of the Land Acquisition Act (1894) meant that the person was allowed to appeal accordingly. \ R \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
