Find a Lawyer

SARHAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, PESHAWAR versus NADIR KHAN

Section 18, 23 and 3 (e) Increase in court-reimbursement The referee judge increased the compensation amount to Rs 457 per diem while compulsory acquisition compensation with mandatory acquisition compensation from 3 years to 21 years 2003 to 22 3 2004 Was determined for the purpose of detecting the value of which was not a reasonable standard to rely on which was connected to the suit property road and commercial and residential property The potential value of the property was high and the valuation made by the collector was a trial court modest There was review. It seemed that no decision could be made in a decision that was not identified as fair or illegal. No decision could be taken if the acquisition charges would be given at the rate of 25% if the company as a border development authority. The acquisition of land. The body was a corporate company and the plaintiffs were essentially entitled to acquisition charges. Instead of 15% api, 25% of ALS were rejected with modifications to the extent of mandatory acquisition charges.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015

• SHUJAT ALI v. The STATE through Advocate General, Khyber Pukhtunkhwa 2015 MLD 1324
• Dr. MUHAMMAD SAFDAR v. Mst. SHAISTA AMJAD 2015 MLD 1342
• ZAHIR REHMAN v. State 2015 PCrLJ 1347
• MUHAMMAD SULTAN KHAN v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR WORKS 2015 CLC 1353
• MUHAMMAD ZAMIN MIAN v. SHAMSHAD 2015 MLD 1384
• FAZAL RAHIM KHAN v. LAC 2015 CLC 1392
• SHAH FAISAL v. Mst. NISHAT 2015 PCrLJ 1397
• Mst. NASREEN BIBI v. SHAMAS UN NISA 2015 YLR 1400

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2015 →

lawer from fb area from Kalaswala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes