TASNIM HUSSAIN NAQVI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 Constitutional Appeal Railway Contract, Applicants approval was not qualified by the Wiggins Directorate of Railway Authorities, only three days before the auction of the successful contractors to participate in the contract. The deadline was also published in two daily newspapers, but on the day that the auction was going to take place, the competent authority accepted / approved the contract despite the fact that the applicant's offer had already reached the authority. Was. The applicant's offer for a deal with bank draft with a sum of Rs 10 lakh was Rs 8 crore while the railway authority accepted the contract for Rs 6 crore while the applicant was disqualified due to litigation with the railway authorities. Was. In some of the earlier agreements, while the case was decided before the petitioner's offer by the Supreme Court, the authorities did not accept that the tender amount could not be received by the contractor unless the mistake was made. I will not be involved in the valid justification on the basis that the applicant had offered more for the contract, especially if the contract was neither open nor transparent in the case where the railway was open. Authorities terminated the contract at Rs 6 crore, in a hurry, keeping in view the interest of the treasury; Yes. The High Court directed the railway authorities to construct a baseline for Rs 8 crore and get a new auction.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
