MAJ. (RETD.) SHEHZAD HUSSAIN?KHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 Constitutional Applicants Treatment against Premature Termination of Employees and Employees' Rights Before the Contract Appointment Employee was appointed for a term of three years but before the expiry of the contract period the employer / officials Had eliminated it. The High Court, which was attacked before the High Court in the Constitution, rejected the plea on the ground that contractual appointment does not give the employee any right to fulfill the contract or to force the employer to complete the contract period. Where one of the remedies suffered premature termination for the contracting parties, the only treatment available was that the only way to be compensated for the economic and physical or mental harm was to succeed. Thus, such losses had to be disputed in terms of money, forcing the unhappy employee to complete the term. No! Legally the contract was as weak as violence as the employer could be in the opposite situation.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Miran Shah lawyer
