Section 6 516A, 71 super and 1 561 carriage return on superdrive, petition for termination of order was not on record to show that the vehicle either had a stolen property, or was ever Only the applicant was accused of using the commission of the crime as he allegedly showed a false number plate of another registered vehicle at the relevant time. After the recording of the evidence was to be resolved at the trial, if the undercover vehicle was left at the police station, it would either be used by the police, or as a result of standing, resulting in damage, deterioration and collapse. I was neither a competing contender for the investigating vehicle, nor was there any need for an investigation. There is no other claimant, nor is there any evidence that the vehicle was stolen or Its chassis / engine number was re-mounted; both courts not considered justifiable to refuse the delivery of the vehicle that was available. Or by the application was accepted and discussed the vehicle was ordered to return to the petitioner sprdry, subject to the provision of guaranteed bonds with securities in these circumstances.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
