MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus ABDUL WAHID
Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Legal Martyrdom (10 of 1984), Article 85 (5) For sale of the plaintiff's cousin and his cultivating accused, the sale and power-off on the basis of a fraudulent and fabricated contract. Another defendant, with the attorney, acquitted the plaintiff in the absence of the plaintiff in his claim that changed in his favor in the absence of the plaintiff and denied the execution of the powers of the lawyers in favor of the second defendant. Demanded that the documents be announced. Illegal and invalid and he was the owner of the land in the plaintiff dispute and did not sell the land to the defendants. The plaintiff's land was exchanged for. The names of the defendants and the execution of which the plaintiff denied, were not even presented on the record and no explanation was given of the error, the defendants of the ant claimed by the defense The Power of Attorney's registration was a public document and its certified copy of the evidence was admissible. The dispute was nullified because under Article 85 (5) of the Convention of Evidence 1984, only such documents could be public documents. Can be processed. Was not disputed, however, because the plaintiff's dismissal of any evidence presented by the defendants to prove the authority of the appellate court was not precisely denied because the mutation was included in the revenue record. That's why they didn't care about it.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Chashma lawyer