Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus CITIBANK N.A.

Section 4 and 9 Civil Procedure Code (V 1908) of the Banking Companies (Debt, Progress, Credit and Recovery of Financial Affairs) Act 1997, O. XXXVII, Rr 2 and 3, leave the case for the recovery of the debt which the defendant borrowed. After the bank failed to fulfill its obligations under the terms of the agreement, the judgment filed by the plaintiff bank was pronounced, and the defendant's request to defend the case was dismissed, which he dismissed in his appeal. What was challenged, the plaintiffs' legal utility using the debt, had accepted their obligation. The case was based on a statement from the Plaintiff's accounts, which was verified by the banking authorities in accordance with the Bankers' Book Evidence Act, 1881, and was not rejected by the defendants, such as section 4 of the banking companies (recovery of loans, The Fair Decisions of Progress, Credits and Finance) Act, 1997 was pronounced and the court correctly concluded that the defendant had failed to present a condemnation case for sanction of leave. To defend the case tax advocates from Jhal Magsi lawyer