MUNIR AHMAD AND 7 OTHERS versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KASUR AND 14 OTHERS
O VI, R 1 7 & Section 115 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application jurisdiction, trial of delay in application for modification of application, court dismisses application but lower appeal in modification process That's what the court allowed. The applicant's jurisdiction was that the application was filed at a later stage and could not be allowed, in the absence of any jurisdictional error in the order, CPC expressly stated that the review The order passed in will be formulated as a final constitutional remedy. There were both extraordinary and extraordinary, and generally dissenting opinion on the proposed amendment of law or fact should not be appealed, nor was the color of this case changed, nor in this case homelessness. The claim for volleyball aid reinstated the same issue. Further amendments to the High Court, including the order passed by the lower appellate court, could not be ratified in rt because it was also prohibited under section 115 (3), cp. C's constitutional petition was not sustained under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Dunyapur lawyer