Find a Lawyer

CHAIRMAN, M.D.A. versus MUHAMMAD AJMAL QURESHI

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants Act 1976 Section 2 (b) The Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act (XXII of 1975); Section 2 [as amended by the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal (Amendment) Act (1st Amendment 1993)] Is] a written request for dismissal of the Mirpur Development Authority Establishment Service Rules, 1991, R15 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Sections 2, 42 and 44 of the Service approved by the Chairman of the Competent Department Appellate Authority. The merits of the writ petition against the dismissal order were challenged on the basis that the government employees filed the writ petition in relation to their terms and conditions of employment. Can't air. Amendment of Section 2 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act 1975, which was fixed in any service or in civil service in the service of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, was employed in connection with the affairs of the state but not such employees. He is employed in connection with the affairs of the state or who has ceased to be a civil servant is not entitled to go to the service tribunal to settle his complaint. e The only course open to such employees was to resolve their grievances by filing a writ petition in the High Court which was not precluded from exercising its jurisdiction. immigration advocates email from Khewra lawyer