MUHAMMAD ARIF versus MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE
Civil Procedure Code Order XXXIX Temporary Injections and Interlocutory Orders Section 54 Civil Procedure Code (V 1908), O XXXX, RR l & 2 Plaintiff's dismissal of the interim relief order for the dismissal of the plaintiff claimed that his father The suit occupied the land and for many years he had improved the construction of the dwelling houses with his family, while the plaintiff prayed that the suit should not be displaced from the land except through lawful means. And his possession could not be disturbed in an illegal way because the defendant accepted that the plaintiff and his father were in possession of the suit land, but they claimed that the plaintiff's possession of the suit land belongs to the offender. Who owned the property. Although it has allowed nature on the suite land in which it has improved the construction of the houses and has lived here since. NG, will not be barred from obtaining the relief required by a court of competent jurisdiction, even if the defendant was occupying a particular land or a house built in it, so as not to evade the said property. Can be done according to law. Not recognizing the illegal and unfair means used to remove a person from property, they were properly granted interim relief by the trial court appellate court and the High Court did not justify the observation. It was alleged that the plaintiff was guilty in the suit. And he could not get any interim relief, the decisions passed by the High Court and the Appellate Court below were set aside in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Phalia lawyer