ABDUL RASHID, FIRE SUPERINTENDENT, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MIRPUR, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR versus MUHAMMAD ASJAD
Rules of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Local Council Service (Appointment and Regulations of Services) 1989 R 5 Appeal to the Supreme Court Order of Mayor Mirpur of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Section 42 Civil Service Appointment , Defendant Defendant In 8, the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Local Government Board put it aside on the ground that it said that the quota for the appointments was violated, this post was neither publicized nor conducted any tests and interviews. Was. Respondents did not own the qualifications designated for the post and this appointment was made in violation of the rules and regulations and without regard to the fact that the respondent was not neglected by the relevant District High Court. The order of this board was set solely on the basis that the defendant was not. Provided a hearing before setting your appointment order. Justification of the High Court decision itself is unlawful and the violation of rules and regulations does not require that respondents be given an opportunity to be heard before an illegal order can be set. Illegal appointment could not be restored by High Court, restoration of respondent's appointment under High Court constitutional jurisdiction orders, Supreme Court put aside on appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Gaggo Mandi lawyer