MUHAMMAD AMIN versus STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 Review of Evidence Last seen evidence Extra-judicial confession of the accused was sent to trial on recovery of the body upon identification of the accused. He was sentenced to life imprisonment by the trial court and the evidence raised by the defendant was that the evidence presented by the prosecution was not credible. The body was recovered from the body on the identification of the accused, who had special knowledge of the accused. Last seen evidence was collected and such evidence is required that the deceased was last seen in the company. The accused was not enough to sustain the murder charge against the accused because such evidence was needed to link the accused to the crime when evidence was confirmed for the last time since the body's recovery on the indictment of the accused. The eyewitness account was supported by the witness. Failure to present a plausible explanation of what was alleged by the prosecution's witnesses, the place and time of the guards where and when the deceased was separated, the charges, in the circumstances, as to the burden of the burden upon him. It cannot be excluded, the court rejects the intervention of the Supreme Court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Sita Road lawyer