SARFRAZ versus STATE
Article 2 30 30, 68 evidence and 8 308 Assessment of evidence is not the responsibility of the Commission on the influence of the first person; Was not an adult and if there was any doubt about the contradiction of his age, his benefit was to go to the accused where the offense was committed under the influence of others, such accused could not demand exemption from punishment. Because the right case was not accused of being trivial. The prisoner was not responsible for the commission of the crime of the Ummah and the death penalty under Section 2302, PP: C the court pronounced the accused death sentence.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Naukot lawyer
