Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HANIF versus STATE

Articles 302, 307, 34 and 149 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 The first incident of restoration of evidence occurred when the complaining party was crossing Circular Road near the house of the accused party, the accused party on the use of circular road. Objected. Hot words were exchanged between them and the complaining party, but the matter was raised on the intervention of some persons riding the tractor trolley of the complaining party, followed by another case, when the accused members. After armed himself with deadly weapons, the complainant went to the party camp and attacked them, resulting in the shooting on the victim's forehead by the accused (appellant), who eventually died. Broke. In such cases, the complaining party proceeded to the Dera knowing that they were armed with deadly weapons and it was likely that the complaining party suffered serious consequences when they were assaulted, and such If every member of the party who constitutes the unlawful assembly, I shall be punished for the offense under Section 149, P, which was shot. In this case, it has been appealed that the motive and the medical evidence that motivated the trust proved beyond reasonable doubt in view of the evidence, the following two courts were also considered together and further added. There was no false statement or evidence was read in this case. The accused against his conviction was dismissed by the Supreme Court in the circumstances registration advocate from Kharian lawyer