Find a Lawyer

HABIB BANK OFFICERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION, GUJRANWALA versus DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, GUJRANWALA

Issuing an order under Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 144 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Section 144, CCP Grounds Scope Petitioners prayed in their constitutional petition that Section 144 of the District Magistrate An order issued under the Act should be declared illegal. , With no legal authority and no legal influence claim which stated that the order could be issued only in cases of immediate threat of rioting or arrest, but there was no such situation, 144 Was to order under, CRPC had to seek order in case of restraint. Avoiding a person from a particular act and not forcing a mandate for a particular act, but the district magistrate issued a mandatory injunction on the said act, which under section 144 the order could not remain in the field order. , Only the CRPC can. The turmoil passed immediately in cases of threat of arrest or arrest, but there was nothing on record to say that the authorities had not laid any such mat. In this regard, without sufficient presence of proceedings under Ariel Section 144, the CRPC and immediate prevention or immediate procurement, stating that the order could not be approved under Article 144, the CRPC had to be mechanized. As approved and the applicants, who were members of the Bank Officers Welfare Association, were not heard before the order was passed. And Beer did not provide the opportunity to instruct the State Bank before the occasion when the district magistrate applicants were not wrong, but they were persecuted by the approval of the seat order, which is a constitutional jurisdiction. law firms from Ali Chak lawyer