Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MOBIN versus SHAHAB-UD-DIN

Appeal against the principles of the British Penal Code Section 324/34 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 417, to delay the filing of an FIR was not sufficiently explained, at the relevant time. Was present at the place of being was not established, did not appear in court to record his evidence and during the investigation proceedings was replaced by the Regional Investigation Officer and the other person who took his place was taken by the prosecution. Not presented The incident was presented in the scene where both parties lived, but no one was prosecuting or Although support was demonstrated in support of the complaint Zam said a lawyer and wounded two others were gathered at the place of location of the neighborhood, the testimony of nature. Without a doubt, those who supported the version of the accused were suffering from injuries on the body of the injured prosecutor's witness, agreeing with the prosecution's trial court's decision to acquit the accused. He could not be convicted unless he was found guilty until he was acquitted of the trial. The court had to examine the principle that it did not need to be harmed unless the appellate court came to the conclusion that a reasonable person could come to that conclusion, or that the verdict of a bad sentence was misleading and that its reasons were artificial and artificial. There was a funny trial court. The recording of the accused's fate, the evidence on record was not neglected, because the evidence of the trial cannot be interfered with by the trial court. best advocate from Kallur Kot lawyer