Find a Lawyer

KHADIM HUSAIN versus THE STATE

The deputy superintendent of police was summoned by the court's witness, who partially investigated the case and was shown as a prosecution witness in the witnesses' calendar. In filing an application for seeking unnecessary accused, the police officer said that during the arrest of the accused, the request as a court witness was rejected by the trial court and the accused reviewed the trial court's order. The police officer found five of the seven innocent and because his opinion was based on attractive and weighty material, the evidence of the police officer, according to the suspect, was simply no wrong to decide the case and the prosecution justified the release. Was not because the prosecutor's witness alleged that it was necessary to have the deputy superintendent summoned to the police Should be checked and at least as a court witness should be investigated by the complainant who attacked the police officer on the basis that the police officer was discharged on the basis that he won by the accused. And it is not necessary to be called a judicial witness, as being a police officer, his opinion was not binding on the trial court. Section 4040, CRC, had a wide range of options for a person's court witness to be used for his or her power, but a person may be called to trial court as a court witness, provided that The evidence of the court is necessary for the decision of the case only. The fact is that the police officer had apologized to the five accused with the crime commission with which they were charged. This was merely a related situation. And law firms from South Wazirstan lawyer