Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HAYAT versus THE STATE

The prosecution's case was found to be extremely difficult in view of the value of the Section 7 Corollary Code (XLV of 1860), Section Section 653/555 / evidence evidence7 / ation ofre evidence, because according to the prosecution, the truck carrying the accused's bag of yarn was approximately 10 10 , Managed to get Rs 00, and 000 and and managed to carry it, but the accused did not try to sell or dispose of the truck or yarn and left the truck with a bag just outside the mausoleum. Twelve days after the incident, no one came forward to claim the yarn in the truck FIR was allegedly made twenty-two hours after the incident. He raised doubts about the authenticity of the entire, prosecution case's defendants, though they do not know the complainant or his brother or the conductor of the truck, but surprisingly all the names and details of the parents Defendant's evidence was given in the FIR, evidence from the defense shows that the accused, who committed the crime, was already in police custody earlier that day, which led to serious suspicion over the entire prosecution case. The accused should go to trial and the accused were sentenced under trial and the accused was acquitted of all charges. ? tax advocates from Tando Adam lawyer