Find a Lawyer

UMAR HAYAT versus THE STATE

Pakistan Panel Code Section 302 (b) Appreciating Evidence There was no background of enmity between the parties alleging that he and his parents were working as a laborer with the complaining party at that time witnesses Were present on the occasion. Similar ocular testimony was corroborated by medical evidence, so it was alleged that the victim was responsible for his murder, however, it was known or described in the trial court as dead. What happened between and. Prior to the original incident, the prosecution had failed to prove the motive in this case but the accused was sentenced, but his sentence was changed to life imprisonment. female advocates from Musafir Khana lawyer