Find a Lawyer

AMANAT KHAN versus STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 2/2 / evidence34 definition of evidence was filed in the FIR as the prosecution's version that the first motive behind the incident was that the accused's cousin was abducted by a motiff who later arrested him. And the other part of it was that the defendant was responsible for the theft of his nephew's bull so there is no credible evidence to the extent that the defendant's nephew's theft motive. But with the accused's cousin recording the statement under s 342 of the abduction of the deceased and other organs of malpractice in connection with his marriage. The CRPC admission by the suspects was confirmed by the suspects, proving that they had a complaint to commit the crime, evidence of rifle recovery, forensic science laboratory report, only the accused's participation. Was proven, but it did not proceed with the prosecution's case involving the participation of the accused, the prosecution's version was proved only on record to the extent that the accused participated in the murder of the accused. Was responsible for the failure to prove the participant's participation in the commission of the crime, punishment and punishment, A. The trial court was set aside and ordered to be released so that, beyond any doubt, it succeeded in convicting the accused's house, his conviction and sentence were upheld. best law firm from Hujra Shah Muqeem lawyer