Find a Lawyer

DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, MULTAN versus PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE

Sections 15 and 17 of the Salary Payment Act 1936 Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application filed by the employees for collection of overtime liabilities by the application commissioner under section 15 of the payment of wages to the employees. Prior to filing an appeal against the Commissioner's order, under section 17 of the said Act, the Labor Court had to convince the employees that in filing the appeal, the employer had to pay the Salary Act, Section 17 (1) (A) of the Salary Act, 1936. ), As an employer, instead of depositing illegal money in cash, the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 Collection 17 (1) (a) is contained in the given amount of L cross cross-checks supplementary statement did not amount to check that it did not consider collecting cash to the Labor Appellate Tribunal was as above. The law was not a precise interpretation of the law, nor does it reflect the realistic situation, nor can the right to appeal to distant technical skills be snatched away, nor can the party be closed on the basis of an inference. And submission of a deduction was a prerequisite for filing an appeal, but a cross-check issued for this purpose cannot be thrown out considering that it cannot be accepted. The amount to be paid by the High Court as directed by the Labor Appeal Tribunal against the order; in the circumstances lawer from fb area from Neelam lawyer