Arts 72, 78, and 79 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), O VII, R 2 Although the document was alive, the author of the document was not presented, nor did he provide any reason for his non-submission. Under which the document was available. No document was created to be registered and no such document was actually worked on the premises, neither was it presented in evidence nor was it on record. Was presented and there was only one photocopy that could neither be presented nor taken into evidence. The evidence and the contents of the evidence were inconsistent in nature and proceeded against each other. Evidence was not reported incorrectly or non-read, the appeal was dismissed with costs.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2013
