TAHIR MEHMOOD INSPECTOR OF POLICE (INVESTIGATION) versus THE STATE THROUGH PROSECUTOR-GENERAL, BALOCHISTAN
The trial court convicted and sentenced the trial court on the admissibility of the Section 5 Interpretation Code (XLV of 1860), Section 161 Definition of Proof of Illegal Trespass on the Contempt of Judicial Magistrate, Conversation. The Judicial Magistrate, therefore, violated the law and the suspected but unconfirmed Judicial Magistrate did not thwart all proceedings in the network raids, because it was not a necessary condition, which was a matter of unlawful pleasure by a civil servant. The allegations against the individuals were accompanied by further allegations. Depending on the nature of the case, certain evidence was needed, the prosecution's case was dismissed for contradicting the witnesses' statements, the trial court failed to consider the evidence in its original context and Also failed to comply. The contradictions that appear in the witness statements, which were that no witnesses have heard the conversation between the accused and the complainant, nor have they seen the exchange of money, the fact of recovering the alleged amount from the accused is not beyond doubt. Yes, the burden of prosecution has to be removed to prove that demand and acceptance exist. Illegally released by government employees but failed, the trial court adjourned the sentence and sentenced the accused to death and acquitted him of the charge.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2013
