ALI AHMED BALOCH versus THE STATE THROUGH NAB AUTHORITIES
Sections 9 (A) (IV), 25, 32 and 33E Voluntary Returns and Deals of Appeals Trial Court, Trial Court Sentenced and Sentenced to Defendant's Jurisdiction for possessing disproportionate assets from known sources of income ? Through the Supreme Court, the authorities filed a petition before the trial court to recover the fines, the accused filed a plea bargaining, which was rejected by the trial court's ratification of section 25 of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 The suspect showed two steps. Taking advantage of the plea bargain, that is, before authorizing the investigation against it and secondly, the appellate chairman is authorized to discharge all of his responsibilities during the trial of the NAB or only in the matter or transaction. Had it not been the case. In any court of law, sub-justice can hear the petition under section 25 of the national case, the countyability ordinance for the plea bargain, 1999, when the matter was pending before him and, after a final verdict, it became a factics officer. And it was not an option to enjoy such pleas. In addition to the confiscated properties, NAB was also empowered to auction off the rest of the property. The accused to recover the fine as Germany's arrears
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2013
