MUHAMMAD ASIF JAN versus CHAIRMAN SELECTION THROUGH CHAIRMAN
Arts 18, 25, 27, and 199 Constitution Petition Examining the Appointments of Individuals with Transparency Discrimination Recruitment, Incomplete, Inappropriate, and Unlawful Candidates for a Special Area The appointment was made in violation of the fundamental rights of all other applicants as it violates their Equal Opportunity Guarantee by Articles 18 and 25. The Constitution and their discrimination were illegal and unconstitutional and had no legal effect, and appointments created a valid title, interest, advantage or privilege among the Chairman and Department Selection Board members. Was not done or not. The failure was a set of skills to prepare a merit list, to prepare a "resultant" list and to appoint individuals, by not conducting tests in certain positions and not producing a merit list in that regard. He is not able to serve on the Selection Committee High. The court set aside the appointments made by the departmental selection committee and at the same time instructed the authorities to pay the costs in relation to each request. The Balochistan Service Tribunal, in these circumstances, has no jurisdiction, therefore, appointments. The Service cannot demand dismissal of his employment in front of the Tribunal's Constitution. Application was allowed under the circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2013
