ALLEM MAHMUD versus SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION
Enforcement of the terms of publicity section 9 and 25 of the Civil Servants Act 1973 challenged the conditions imposed for public servants, under which their development as senior joint secretary was approved and notified in BP section 21, But his management staff was subject to completion of the course at the college. The National Defense College (PASC / NDC) did not have any evidence that the Central Selection Board postponed the development of a civil servant due to course completion, but rather the Central Selection Board. The government employee was recommended to be promoted and approved by the competent authority. The conditions for completing the course while issuing a notification to the public servants about its development, thus, had no legal justification, if there is a wide gap between the concept of postponement for consideration and the conditional promotion, if there was a shortage of elections. Is considered by the Central Selection Board. The matter of training, public servant has neither been made nor communicated to the Authority, in the hands of the Government employees by any other authority properly considered, proposed and approved in the matter. There was also no legal power to enforce the condition because no such terms were provided in the provision of any law or under the law and under section 9 of the Civil Servants Act, 1973, to violate the legal right of public servants. In accordance with the provisions of section 25 of the Government Employees Act, 1973 Subordinate legislation is much more important, therefore, because the controversial training regime
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
