Find a Lawyer

HAFIZ AHMED KHAN versus SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION

Section 8 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 seniority appellants demand direct recruiters for their appointment from 1995 when their case was appointed by the Public Service Commission as an Associate Professor. The Public Service Commission's legitimate recommendations had to be read out to eventually be implemented by the relevant ministry for the treatment of whichever date of recommendation as the date of appointment to join the seniority. Could not be before the date of enrollment in a special grade before or after the date of joining seniority. Efficient will be treated appointment. From the date on which the appointments have taken place, not before the date of the selection process was started in 1994. Recommendations were finalized in 1995 and appointments were issued in 1996 and none of the appellants who joined them before January 1996 could be considered as the Batch of 1995. And thus in 1995 he was not able to calculate his seniority from any date immigration advocate from Nowshera Cantt lawyer