Find a Lawyer

MUNIR AHMED versus AUDITOR-GENERAL OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD

Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4 Civil Servants Act (LXX of 1973) Section 22 Offensive Remarks A legitimate public servant had the right to enter into his ACR the negative representation of the negative remarks, which was decided by the next higher authority, on appeal. Had to do with the distinction between And under section 4 of the Service Tribunals Act 1973, as well as section 22 of the Civil Servants Act 1973, there is a possibility of filing a review of the application in the case where the appeal was a hearing or not, but the law submitted that there was representation. ? To be presented to the next higher authority in cases where the appeal was not generally civil. The employee filed a representation in November, 1996 against negative comments and proceedings on representation by the appropriate next authority under the law. Was changed to delegates instead. Review requests in violation of legal provisions and were sent to the same officer and did not feel the need to amend any of the amendments to your earlier inspections in the AC of government employees. He had funded the abortion of justice, especially civil when the reporting of complaints against him by a civil servant was not serious and the suspicions of the reporting officer were not serious and Neither were imaginary but they were based and for concrete reasons report Officer Ng, thus, in the light of such events was biased and impartial mind can not use, because they reject representation was declared null and void of any legal basis how to become a advocate from Peshawar lawyer