CANTONMENT BOARD, MULTAN versus NISARUL HAQ
The Cantonment Act, 1924, Section 265 (1) of the Arbitration Act (X40 of 1940), the provisions of sections 10 and 14 are not decided by the majority of the votes of the Committee of Arbitration in the process of such arbitration, subject to the general terms and conditions In addition to violations, there was also a breach of the legal provisions contained in section 265 (1) of the Arbitration Act, 1940, the Cantonment Act, 1924, and such provisions relate to the conduct of the Constitution and the Arbitration Committee and, if any, Decision of the Committee. The majority of the votes cast at the meeting shall be in which at least three of the Chairman and other members were present where the majority of the members did not give the award, such award was less than the requirements of the provisions. Was not sustainable under other law conditions
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Naseerabad lawyer
