Find a Lawyer

LAHORE CHEMICAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL WORKS LTD., LAHORE PAKISTAN versus UNILEVER N.V. NETHERLAND

Special Relief Act 1877 Sections 54 and 55 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O XXXX, RR 1, 2 and O XLIII, R 1 (r) suit under a permanent and mandatory injunction contract under which the applicant manufactures the product. Was allowed to sell and sell. The defendants, afterwards terminated and were told that despite the information on the termination of the contract, the appellant was terminated on the appellant, the sale of the respondents' products was continued, a permanent and imperative order against the applicants. In addition to the subpoena, the application for a temporary injunction was also accepted. Following the termination of the agreement, the appellant could not produce the respondent's product nor use his trademark for trial court accuracy. Under the circumstances the respondent is sued for granting immunity. Or terminate a contract refusing to grant agency rights, use this indication that the injunction against the applicant was bound to cause irreparable and irreparable harm to the applicant, in these cases, the trial court Was granted in favor of the appellant, who failed to identify any legal impairment in the trial court's ruling and used discretion by the court. On appropriate judicial principles, there is no scope for interference in this order list of supreme court advocates from Dunyapur lawyer