Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 (1), Third Providence Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/306/308 Due to legal delay, the accused is the daughter of the accused, section 306 Submitted under (b). , PPC and if ultimately punishable under section 3030, PPC read with sections 306 and 308, the maximum penalty prescribed under PPR by the third provision in accordance with section 497 (1). What has been delayed will be considered as punishment for the purpose of counting. The CCP accused has been in prison for the past one year and has not yet been challaned in court, cannot be held responsible for the delay. The accused is a civil servant and was not required in any other criminal case. The fourth provision of section 497 (1) was not affected, CCP Bell was allowed in the circumstances immigration advocates phone number from Kallat lawyer