MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus AUDITOR-GENERAL OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD
Section 25 (b), 15 (a), Proviso and 9 of the Punjab Service of Special (Special Powers) Ordinance (IV of 2000), Section 5 (5), with the Government Official National Accountability Bureau (NAB) requesting a bail agreement. Such incompetent governmental officer was charged with acting as a virtual divisional accounts officer for removal of such officer from his department without regular inquiry, alleging that he had committed irregularities and The corruption was arrested by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB), but the plea bargain entered into it, which was accepted and sent to the National Accountability Rd. Released under section 25 (b) of the NINS, the 1999 chairman NAB informed the accused that he had entered into a plea bargain, indicating that he had been sentenced under national accountability. ? The ordinance, 1999, and the discharge of public office, which resulted in the defendant being issued a showcase notice to his department and subsequent appeals filed by the accused against his dismissal, were also filed by his department and the Federal Service Tribunal. He was fired, alleged that his department did not conduct regular investigations before removing him from employment, and could only be disqualified publicly. If he was convicted of an offense referred to under Section 9 of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, the case for the accused was legally regulated by Section 25 (b) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, Because he had signed a bail plea during his trial. And the National Accountability Court ordered his release under the aforementioned section. National Ah
