Under Section 15 Evidence Act (of 1872), Section 157 law evidence (10 of 1984), Article 153 pre-discrimination claims the plaintiff has been accused of denying the former discrimination rights The pre-emptive right to own is the prerogative right. On the basis of the gift deadline in Kanal State and using it for agricultural purposes, the claimant requested that he had already vacated the gift land by filing a pre-emption suit, but was unsuccessful because the defendant had filed for residential purpose. Was a landowner and he was a non-agricultural landowner The plaintiff had in the previous case presented a copy of the evidence of the defendant's statements, which shows that the gift deed was obtained through a residential purpose. The defendant's statement was made in the case that he had acquired the land for the occupants. Purpose, but he later changed his mind of living and began to cultivate in the same way, and that his residence was in a different place, the statement that he later changed his mind, his previous one. The statement did not reflect, without confronting it, which would not be credible with the evidence and the defendant could not be contested in this case, the evidence was not admissible in the circumstances. Done \ r \ n
