Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD INAYAT GONDAL versus REGISTRAR LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE

Section Constitution Constitution Pakistan, Article 1 (185) officer Judicial Officer dismissed from employment Appellate Service Tribunal Preliminary hearing Appeal sought by Judicial Officer Judicial High Court interference in administrative matters The hearing of the petitioner's applicant's scope was severe because of his dismissal and his service appeal had not yet been heard by the Punjab (Punjab) Sub-judicial Service Tribunal, so it is possible. That the Supreme Court may facilitate the hearing of their appeal immediately The fact that the Supreme Court has generally shown a slowdown in interfering with the administrative affairs of the High Court, the Supreme Court directed the judicial officer to file an appeal before the Chief Justice HC for resolving his complaint. Appeal for leave of leave was dealt with by observation.If such a petition was filed, the Supreme Court had truthfully said that the Chief Justice High Court had appealed the service of the Judicial Officer through the Tribunal at his appropriate convenience. May consider approving an appropriate direction for the hearing. \ R \ n

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2013

• LANVIN TRADERS, KARACHI v. PRESIDING OFFICER, BANKING COURT NO.2, KARACHI 2013 SCMR 1419
• QAISER ABBAS v. MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. 2013 CLD 1430
• GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Chief Secretary, Government of Punjab v. Syed MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE SHAH 2013 SCMR 1468
• Raja MUHAMMAD ZAFAR-UL-HAQ, SENATOR v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN 2013 SCMR 1480
• ALI MUHAMMAD v. State 2013 SCMR 1484
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. AUDITOR-GENERAL OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD 2013 PLC(CS) 1487
• Engineer IQBAL ZAFAR JHAGRA v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2013 PTD 1491
• Haji ABDUL SATTAR v. FAROOQ INAYAT 2013 SCMR 1493

All Supreme Court judgments of 2013 →

immigration advocates email from FR Kohat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes