Find a Lawyer

KHIZAR HAYAT versus SARD ALI KHAN

Article 31 (a) and (? (1) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article ? (3)) suits for pre-emption discrimination, the registration of such registrar in the registration of the registrar's count. Failure to file public notice within two weeks. (1) The KP Pre-Impression Act, 1987 provides that such failure of the Registrar Period will result in no pre-requisite information for filing a pre-emption suit and no sale deadline. The provisions in respect of issuance from the registration of the same are made by a Registrar under a public notice contained in Section 32 of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pre-Emission Act 1987 There was no nexus in the pre-emption suit in connection with the sale of the sale transaction, except for the limitation period set by Section 31 of the Act. The leave was dismissed for appeal in the circumstances. And was denied leave

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2013

• MUKHTIAR AHMAD v. Haji MUHAMMAD SALEEM 2013 SCMR 357
• Mehmood Ahmad Butt, Deputy Director, Regional Directorate, Anti-Narcotics Force, Lahore v. Mst. FAZEELAT BIBI 2013 PLD 361
• M. NAZIR AHMAD v. MUHAMMAD ASLAM 2013 SCMR 363
• Syed MEHMOOD ALI SHAH v. ZULFIQAR ALI 2013 PLD 364
• G. M. PAKISTAN RAILWAYS v. MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE 2013 SCMR 372
• PAKISTAN STEEL through Chairman/CEO v. MUHAMMAD ASLAM CHAUDHRY 2013 SCMR 375
• TEHSIL MUNICIPAL OFFICER, TMA KAHUTA v. GUL FRAZ KHAN 2013 PLC(CS) 377
• MUHAMMAD YASIN v. State 2013 SCMR 378

All Supreme Court judgments of 2013 →

immigration advocate from Karak lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes