PAKISTAN STEEL THROUGH CHAIRMAN/CEO versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM CHAUDHRY
Arts 212, 199 and 185 (3) removal of service (special powers) from the ordinance (XVII of 2000) (dismissed), dismissal of section 3 employees for termination of employment under the challenge order of dismissal of scope scope proceedings. The ban on the matter (special powers) was canceled by Pakistan Steel Mills under the Ordinance 2000 (after which it was canceled) and as a result he was immediately dismissed. Employees' court appeals were also dismissed before the Federal Service Tribunal was dismissed by employees as disqualifying. The employees of the Supreme Court (PLD 2006 SC 602) filed a constitutional petition before the High Court in the case of Mohammad Mubeen Salam and other Federation of Pakistan through the Secretary, Ministry of Defense and others, which was allowed. And his dismissal order was set aside and it was held that he was entitled to benefits from the date of his dismissal till the age of his post. The dispute on behalf of Pakistan Steel Mills was also that the corporation. (Mills) had no legal rule, therefore, the High Court had no jurisdiction in the matter, Deputy Attorney General Said that the High Court has jurisdiction over the matter since the proceedings took place. Under the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance 2000, it is justified against the employee that Article 1212 of the Constitution did not set the terms and conditions of the employee. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal to be considered, An employee of a corporation such as Pakistan Steel Mills, against whom the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance 2000 was processed, has the order
