Para 1725 (a) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 212 (3) Increase in fines after issuance of civil service misconduct penalty showcase notice does not provide reasons for increase in fines Impact Government employee / suspect, who is fuel clerk Were serving as a service member. , He was prosecuted for corruption because he allegedly kept a fake record at the behest of his superiors / co-accused. The authorized authority reduced the government employee to two time scales in the time scale for two years. Penalty awarded - General Manager Railway / Appellate Authority During the appeal hearing, some of the co-accused accused themselves issued a notice of increase in fines to the civil servant and the service tribunal subsequently allowed the government employee to appeal. And restored the original sentence of reduction of two steps in the stipulated time for two years. The allegation of misconduct by a civil servant / accused was different from that of the co-accused, who was his immediate superior and whom he had made fake entries to the General Manager Railway / Appellate Authority to the Government employee, Pakistan Railway Personnel Manual As per paragraph 1725 (a) of the K, notice was to be given in advance and the reasons for such a proposed increase had to be stated. The notice issued to a civil servant in Germany did not provide clear reasons for the increase in fines, and only noted that the actual punishment did not correspond to the attractiveness of the crime, the Search Tribunal's address The imposition was not arbitrary, against the record or under Railway law, the authorities / applicants did not raise any question of public importance under which the Constitution
