The probability of a breach of the peace in the land-related dispute 145, the CCP, before the magistrate, claimed that he was the owner of the disputed property and had engaged a tenant, which the offenders (applicants) had filed under section 145, CRC forcibly dismissed the police seeking report, but no report was submitted. Through the police, the High Court directed the magistrate to look into the complainant's complaint, and upon receiving the police's information, the two sides also appeared before the magistrate magistrate, which considered the violation of the peace. There is a risk and accordingly, for the adjudication of the property, the first appellate court without a determination directed the Station House Office to file an appeal against the order of the individual appellate court to appeal against the order of the individual appellate court. Was dismissed by the High Court. The Validity Station House Officer inspected that he had investigated and was He confirmed that the dispute was initially in the custody of the complainant, and that after the suspects had their hideout, the premises were demolished and shops were built on it, and the station house officer in the disputed premises peacefully. Expressing grave concern over the alleged breach, shops were ordered in the demolished premises ordered by the magistrate first appellate court and the High Court disputed the evidence of the Station House Officer (SHO). The restoration of the possession of the property was properly ordered and the complainant accused sought to relieve the complainant. After the subject's destruction of property and encourage new construction. Magistrate Faisal
