The Preamble and the Section 33C Accountability Act (IX of 1997), the presentation of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 and the Accountability Act, 1997, are consistent with the Objectives, Objectives, and Understanding Accountability Act, 1997. It was implemented only for termination. Regarding the methods of corruption and corruption in public offices, the application of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 does not even mention the public offices and, in turn, eliminates corruption and corruption and holds all those responsible. ? Provide effective measures for corruption, misconduct, misuse or misuse of powers or powers, misuse of property, kickbacks, investigation of commission cases, investigations, prosecutions and quick disposal. Recovery of state money and other assets from individuals who have misused or eliminated such money or assets through corruption, methods of corruption, and illicit use of power or authority. Finding, obtaining or providing international legal assistance for corruption matters. And to inform society about the causes and effects of corruption and corrupt practices in implementing policies and procedures for the prevention of corruption in the society, from the scope of the application of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 to the Accountability Act 1997 Much bigger and it will be. Examining the former through the narrow prism of the latter's objection to the National Accountability Ordinance 1999, to save the entire society from the curse of corruption
