Find a Lawyer

SUO MOTU CASE NO.13 OF 2010 versus

Articles 9 and 184 (3) of the Rawalpindi-related water supply to Rawalpindi by Article 184 (3) of the Constitution by the Supreme Court, action by Rawal Lake on solid waste and liquid emissions from lake pollution. The Pak Provincial Government took steps to improve it so that Rawal Lake could be made pollution free. The Supreme Court directed that the concerned department should monitor the steps taken to make Rawal Lake pollution-free so that it could provide pure water to Rawalpindi and its citizens. The suburbs are that if there is any complaint in the future, the same should be filed with the Environment Tribunal by the Director General of Punjab, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and that the Director General should go away from Rawal Lake and report on their case. Present. Under this, the Registrar Supreme Court Petition was dealt with

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2013

• AHMAD v. SHAFIQ-UR-REHMAN 2013 SCMR 583
• BLUE STAR SPINNING MILLS LTD. v. COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX 2013 SCMR 587
• Syed ANWAR ALI SHAH v. IRFAN ALI alias GHULAM RAZA alias RAMZAN 2013 SCMR 590
• SUO MOTU CASE NO.13 OF 2010 2013 SCMR 591
• ABDUL AZIZ MEMON v. State 2013 PLD 594
• Rana MUHAMMAD NAVEED v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary M/o Defence 2013 SCMR 596
• FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE 2013 SCMR 634
• A.C.P. OIL MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED v. The ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (APPRAISEMENT) 2013 SCMR 638

All Supreme Court judgments of 2013 →

law firms from More kunda lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes