MUHAMMAD SIDEMAN versus STATE
Prohibited (Enforcement of Head) Order 1979 Article 4 The prosecution's trial of the testimony of evidence was supported only by the Investigation Officer witness who did not support the prosecution case from the public was declared admissible and the other recovery witness The police constable was released, while the rest of the statements did not advance the prosecution's case because of a lack of an account, where the investigating officer's subordinate was not ready to support the prosecution's case, the sole testimony of the investigating officer. Cannot be safely laid to rest on the conviction and punishment of the accused S, especially when the prosecutor failed to bring any of the violations against the accused during the investigation against the prosecutor's witness, who was declared as a prosecution for failing to prove the case against the accused, the defendant's conviction and The sentence was set aside.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Khanpur lawyer