Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KALAM versus STATE

Under the Prohibition (Enforcement) Order 1979 Articles 3 and 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Sections 342, 364, 537 and 340 (2) of the Unlawful Record of Crimes The required certification was not ordered, the CCP was merged under it by the trial court: Defendants' statements 5 342 did not intend to be filed under the CRPC, nor did it provide for section 4 36 ( (), Adhered to the terms of the CRPC, and there were no illegal acts. The trial court did not do its duty to tell the accused that he had the right to make statements on oath under the law, as a result of the failure of justice as a result of Article 7 537, CRPC. Section 40 340 (?), provided under CRPC. They had the option to either make or not make statements, without any risk, and the trial court's dismissal of such error was reversed, the trial court did not ask the accused. Whether they will present any evidence in defense. And such negligence was taken to suppose that the accused would not have had the opportunity to present the defense evidence if they had made the same choice. The remand for the trial was obtained from the recording phase of the statements. Section 342, CR PC property advocate from Rabwah lawyer