Find a Lawyer

ALI AHMAD versus STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 396 evidence was defined as no identification parade and the accused was already identified by the prosecution witness for almost two years and three months after the date of the incident. Such identification of the accused can be considered a joke and is not considered as legal evidence The appointment of the witness of the prosecutor who claimed that he had identified the accused was not affected by the identity of the accused. Through litigation, it was not legally unreliable, and considerable delays were found in the prosecution's delayed testimony. Recording the defendant's confessional statement for fourteen days was fatal to the explicit value of the statement, especially when no explanation was given for the delay, and the accused, who alleged that his confessional statement was forcibly taken by the police. Was remanded in custody, denied a confessional statement. On the final day, the judicial confession was neither confirmed by the accused on the spot nor by the free and unwilling witnesses, nor could any such confession which had been withdrawn and did not seem to be voluntary and truthful, it can be believed that the prosecution Failure to present sufficient material to include the accused. In the case of extreme suspicions in the commission or against the accused for the increase in crime, he was taken advantage of by the suspect and his conviction and sentence were set aside. best advocate from Jhang lawyer