Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD QASIM versus STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 342, 439 and 537 Prohibition (Enforcement Hadith) Order (4 of 1979), Article 4 Section 342 Inspection of the accused, CRC's effect after closing evidence of prosecution. , The statements of the accused and the defense witness were tried and the case was adjourned for argument, the hearing was adjourned under 540, the application under the CCPC was filed by the prosecution, in which to examine the witness. Permission was sought, which recorded the confessional statement of the accused's plea, recorded the statement of the prosecutor's witness and the verdict of the non-investigating suspect The prosecution witness who submitted the confessional statement of the accused was examined as an additional witness to the prosecution's closure as well as to the defense evidence, trial under trial 342, CR P.C. Of the crime. The opportunity to explain your status in relation to the recording of your confession, especially when recording a conviction against the accused, relied primarily on a confessional statement, complying with the provisions of 34 342, P.C.P. Was necessary and it was not permissible to depart from it, if it appears to have been inspected if any prejudice was charged. Under Section 2 34 Cr, the accused was not a mere formality, but the defendant's evidence must enable the accused to explain any circumstance that may arise against him, in connection with the conviction in connection with the crime. For questioning, the trial court could not be declared to have a treatable defect or irregularity under which the court's decision was set aside and Section 342, CR immigration advocates contact from Killa Saifullah lawyer