Find a Lawyer

KHAN MUHAMMAD versus STATE

The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 10 (2), 11 and 16 of the evidence, which were convicted by the trial court under trial and adultery under section 10 (2) and 11 (Enforcement Hood). In the ordinance, 1979, he claimed that he was a legally married spouse, the evidence on record proved the existence of a marriage, which included a confessional statement of a male suspect, and his confession proved to be a crime, The female suspect was neither kidnapped nor compelled. The man was married to the accused, but he married voluntarily. The female accused was allegedly subjected to torture by other accomplices and was taken into custody along with the components of sections 10 (2) and II of the adultery. Can have illicit intercourse with. (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979, was not constituted and it was stated that the components of section 16 of this ordinance were construed to the extent of guilt by partner law. The trial court held that the accused were used, sentenced, and sentenced separately, and they were acquitted of the charges against them, and the accomplices were convicted and sentenced under Section 16 of the Ordinance. immigration advocates phone number from Sangote lawyer