Find a Lawyer

HABIB BANK LIMITED versus STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 516A & 517 Prohibition (Enforcement Hadith) Order (4 of 1979), restitution of Arts 3 and 4 vehicles was allegedly used for offense under Article 3 of the Prohibition. ? ) The order by the accused, 1979, belonged to the applicant bank, which was formally listed in the records of the Excise and Taxation Motor Registration Authority Petitioner Bank, which, in fact, the owner of the said vehicle referred the accused to the Minister. Finance was provided for the purchase of the same under the Prime Minister. An agreement between the scheme for the public transport and the applicant bank was executed and the accused, who was convicted and sentenced by the trial court, was acquitted on appeal, but no order in connection with the restoration of the vehicle was filed with Petitioner Bank. Not approved. In fact, according to the evidence in the record, the owner of the vehicle was not given any notice before the order of confiscation and the vehicle was left unattended while completing any reasonable opportunity to advance his point of view. Notwithstanding the applicant's bank and any accused for any reason for confiscating the vehicle without giving any notice or offering any opportunity, without presenting the applicant's view, There was no such alliance. Bank confiscation, in connection with vehicle seizure, was in violation of the principles established by natural justice because no one could be deprived or deprived of any property and without any notice and no opportunity was granted to the vehicle. The applicant was ordered to be reinstated at the bank. The interest of justice that makes it an indictment of the acquitted female advocates from Khuiratta lawyer