Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus STATE


The accused did not make any confessional statement, awarding the sentence of hadith without prejudice to the injunction of the injunction (Enforcement Limitation) 1979 Arts 8, 9 and 11, nor did the trial court grant Tazaqah al-Shaud under Article 9 of the ban. Was mentioned. (Order), 1979; therefore the provisions of Article 8 were not attracted and instead the case of the accused fell under Article 11, the accused was quite young and the ex-offender and he was sent to jail bars for almost a year. Were behind. As a result of the Prohibition (Enforcement of Limitation) Order 1979, its Article 11 was changed and thereafter, after strictly punishing each of the Pepe's bandages, he was already sentenced to life in prison. Was gone

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocate from Neelam lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.