Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SATTAR versus STATE

The Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance 1979 Section 20 Determination Code (XLV of 1860), the testimony of section 392 The second witness also examined himself by the police under Section 161, CCPC, in which he was accused. Was named and denied by all his prosecution witnesses that they refuse to identify the accused in the courtroom, in which case, the extraordinary prosecutor who alleged that he was His allegation was beyond reasonable doubt, his conviction and sentence were upheld, however, notices were issued to both witnesses as to why Why not prosecute them for false accusations? And contempt of court advocate for immigration from Mian Chunnu lawyer