Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUL SATTAR versus STATE


The Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance 1979 Section 20 Determination Code (XLV of 1860), the testimony of section 392 The second witness also examined himself by the police under Section 161, CCPC, in which he was accused. Was named and denied by all his prosecution witnesses that they refuse to identify the accused in the courtroom, in which case, the extraordinary prosecutor who alleged that he was His allegation was beyond reasonable doubt, his conviction and sentence were upheld, however, notices were issued to both witnesses as to why Why not prosecute them for false accusations? And contempt of court

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
registration advocate from Parachinar lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.